Think of one character from your story and then check the boxes by all the statements that apply to your character. Sometimes they are nested (i.e. some are indented below others and carry a different ordering), and then the indented ones are more detailed versions of the basic statement above them; if the basic statement does not apply, you can ignore all the indented ones, but if it does apply, you should check both it and any indented statements below it that also apply.
In all cases, the statements should be checked if they are true at any point in the story - if one were "The character has a Charizard", it would not be an excuse if the character hasn't obtained a Charizard yet but will in the future. (Of course, be reasonable here - when I say "true at any point in the story", I don't mean that you should aggressively check statements like that Charizard one if the character just got one in some sort of a rental Pokémon tournament, and if you did something a couple of times in the story long ago but would never do it again, it may not be fair to force you to check it, depending on just how significant it is. Just try to use your own judgement.) Also, if the character did something prior to the story you should at least check the statement if it is mentioned in the story, and if you want a more thorough idea of the Sueness of the character altogether and not just whether he or she will be turning readers off this particular story, always check them.
The questions marked Redemption: and any questions nested within them will subtract from your score rather than add to it if checked.